As already discussed in a previous blog post, the most frequently used theoretical model for the rehabilitation of attention is the clinical model of Sohlberg and Mateer, in which attention is divided hierarchically into five levels, with alternating attention being the fourth level. This means that to efficiently carry out an activity requiring alternating attention, a proper functioning of focused, sustained and selective attention is required1.
What is alternating attention?
Alternating attention is the ability to shiftthe focus of attention and move between two or more activities with different cognitive requirements. Mental flexibility is thereby required to enable the switch and to perform the different tasks efficiently, without the cognitive load of one task limiting the performance of the others, or task switching itself altering concentration1.
The engagement of lower levels of attention is clear. On the one hand, focused attention, the most basic type, is required to respond to different stimuli. On the other hand, sustained attention is needed to properly perform a task, while selective attention is essential to carrying out an activity at a given time without interference from other stimuli or items of information. An example of a task included in the Attention Process Training (APT) program to target deficits in alternating attention is a cancellation task in which participants are asked to first cross out a target stimulus and then, whendirected, switch to crossing out the other2. As you can see, this is a cancellation task in which attention must be sustained on the target stimulus while at the same time, ignoring the other stimuli until switching takes place, that is, the momentin which mental flexibility comes into play.
We use this type of attention in many daily life situations sincewe are constantly performing several tasks at the same time. By way of illustration, here is an example:meal preparation.Imagineheating soup on the stove that must be stirred from time to time;when you are not stirring the soup, youare chopping other ingredients that will later be added to the soup. Here you have two tasks, stirring and chopping, and each one requires carrying out a pattern of movements and a different cognitive loadsincechopping an onion requires more attention and caution to avoid cutting ourselves than stirring the soup. This may seem like two relatively simple tasks, however, for people who havedifficulties in alternating attention, this would be very complicated because they need more time to shift their focus of attention, pick up and initiate new task requirements.
Assessment of alternating attention
Commonly usedtests to assess alternating attention usually involve other cognitive processes such as working memory. Some of these tests—briefly described below—are the Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B), the Letter-Number Sequencing subtest from the WAIS-IV, and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT).
The Trail Making Test (TMT) is one of the most widely used neuropsychological tests to assess attention and executive functions, and consists of two parts. In part A (TMT-A), 25 circles are distributed over a sheet of paper and numbered 1-25; participants should draw lines to connect the numbers in ascending order (i.e., 1-2-3-4-etc.) as quickly as possible. In part B (TMT-B), the circles include 13 numbers (1-13) and 12 letters (A-L); participants should draw lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern and alternate between the numbers and letters (i.e., 1-A-2-B-3-C, etc.). This second part of the test is widely used as a measure of executive function and alternating attention since mental flexibility is required to shift between sets3.
Letter-Number Sequencing is a subtest from the WAIS-IV. A sequence of mixed-up numbers and letters are presented orally to the participant. The examinee must repeat the numbers firstin ascending order and then the letters in alphabetical order. This subtestmeasures alternating attention, concentration, and working memory4.
The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is used to assess attention and processing speed. Using a reference key, the subject’s task isto place the correct number that is associated with each symbol in designated boxes. The test includes a total of 110 items and the final score is the correct number of substitutions in 90 seconds5.
Rehabilitation of alternating attention
As in any rehabilitation program, patients should start training with simple tasks, that is, short-duration exercises with low stimulus load and kibg oeruidis in-between changes. As rehabilitation progresses, these variables should be adjustedso that the time spent on the task, the stimuli—in quantity and complexity—, andthe frequency of changeincrease, and the duration of stimulus, in the case of virtual programs, decreases.
Towards this purpose, there are several rehabilitation programs that we have addressed, such as the APT or the platform NeuronUP, which use pencil-and-paper tasks or computer games.This task modality is however not the only one used, as it has been found that byusing music as a rehabilitation tool, considerable progress can be achieved.
Music as a therapeutic tool in rehabilitation
Over the last few decades, numerous research studies have been done on the benefits of music in all its variants, either passively, i. e. music listening canenhance the recoveryofcognitive functions and mood6, or actively through the practice of a musical instrument7,8 or through dance9,10. Since the studies reported positive results, musical therapy is now widely used in rehabilitation programs. This is the case of the Musical Attention Training Program (MATP), an adaptation of Sohlberg and Mateer’sAPT, in which four out of the fivelevels of attention of the APT program are trained, but through the useofmusical components11.
In alternating attention training, the task is as follows: a melodic line is presented to participants, who are instructed to press a key on the keyboardwhen they hear a pre-determined melodic motive.At a certain point, adrum track begins and participants must press another key to produce a percussion sound along with the drum track at the downbeat ofevery measure. When the drum track ends, they shift attention back to the melodic task component, thus alternating attention between both task components; the trials included in this training are made up oftarget motives of progressively increasing length. One advantageous aspect of thistherapy interventionwas the variety of musical styles available (rock, pop, reggae etc.), so that training could be customized to suit individual tastes, thus increasing participant motivation11.
Once again, we must highlight the importance of adapting and tailoring rehabilitation programs to the individual needs of patients by using ecologically valid tasks that are motivating for them, as this will increase collaboration and participation in rehabilitation, while also enabling the extrapolation of rehabilitation outcomes in their daily life.
- Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Effectiveness of an attention-training program. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 1987;9(2):117–30.
- Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Improving Attention and Managing Attentional Problems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006;931(1):359–75.
- Reitan, R. M. (1958). The validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organicbrain damage. Perceptual andMotor Skills, 8, 271-276.
- Amador, J. A. (2013). Escala de inteligencia de Wechsler para adultos-IV (WAIS-IV).
- Arribas, D. (2002). Symbol DigitModalities Test (Test de Símbolos y Dígitos). Madrid: TEA Ediciones S.A.
- Särkämö, T., Tervaniemi, M., Laitinen, S., Forsblom, A., Soinila, S., Mikkonen, M., … &Peretz, I. (2008). Music listeningenhancescognitiverecovery and mood after middle cerebral arterystroke. Brain, 131(3), 866-876.
- Forgeard, M., Winner, E., Norton, A., &Schlaug, G. (2008). Practicing a musical instrument in childhood is associated with enhanced verbal ability and nonverbal reasoning. PloSone, 3(10), e3566.
- Schneider, S., Schönle, P. W., Altenmüller, E., &Münte, T. F. (2007). Using musical instruments improve motor skill recovery following a stroke. JournalofNeurology, 254(10), 1339-1346.
- Hackney, M. E., & Earhart, G. M. (2009). Effects of dance on movement control in Parkinson’s disease: a comparison of Argentine tango and American ballroom. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 41(6), 475-481.
- Earhart, G. M. (2009). Dance as therapy for individuals with Parkinson disease. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 45(2), 231.
- Knox R, Yokota-Adachi H, Kershner J, Jutai J. Musical attention training program and alternating attention in brain injury: An initial report. Music Therapy 2003;21(2):99-104.
Latest posts by NeuronUP (see all)
- Manual therapy course for patients with brain injury - March 2, 2018
- The PhD in Neurological Pathology, Ángel Sánchez Cabeza, will give a presentation on the functional repercussions of apraxias - February 26, 2018
- NeuronUP to attend the HIMSS Annual Conference and Exhibition in Las Vegas - February 22, 2018